Implementasi Algoritma SAW dan Topsis untuk Penentuan Prioritas Program Kerja pada Sistem Informasi Manajemen HMI UNIRA Malang
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.46880/jmika.Vol10No2.pp831-840Keywords:
SAW, TOPSIS, Sensitivity Analys, Decision Support SystemAbstract
Work program prioritization at HMI Wahid Hasyim Commissariat, UNIRA Malang, has been carried out subjectively through daily meetings (RAHAR) without measurable assessment parameters, potentially causing more strategic programs to be delayed due to poorly managed resource limitations. This study aims to design and build a web-based Management Information System for HMI's administration, equipped with a Decision Support System module using the hybrid SAW-TOPSIS method with five assessment criteria: Human Resources, Budget Requirements, Urgency Level, Schedule Suitability, and Technical Complexity. The SAW method is used to normalize and weight the criteria values, while the TOPSIS method determines the distance of each alternative from the positive and negative ideal solutions. The system was developed using the Waterfall method and implemented with JavaScript, Node.js, Express.js, and PostgreSQL. Black Box Testing showed a 100% success rate, and sensitivity analysis with 20 weight change scenarios yielded an average ranking change percentage of 0%, proving the system produces stable and reliable work program priority recommendations.
References
De Souza, D. G. B., Dos Santos, E. A., Soma, N. Y., & Da Silva, C. E. S. (2021). MCDM-Based R&D Project Selection: A Systematic Literature Review. Sustainability, 13(21), 11626. https://doi.org/10.3390/su132111626
Dwisakti, M. A., & Ramadhani, S. (2026). Evaluation of User Acceptance of Online Transportation Applications Using User Acceptance Testing. Jurnal Armada Informatika, 10(1), 315-322. https://doi.org/10.36520/jai.v10i1.278
Fasya. (2024). Prioritas Strategi Kesehatan dan Keselamatan Kerja (K3) Menggunakan Metode SAW dan TOPSIS Pada PT PLN Nusantara Power UP Muara Tawar. Jupiter: Publikasi Ilmu Keteknikan Industri, Teknik Elektro dan Informatika, 2(4), 259–274. https://doi.org/10.61132/jupiter.v2i4.474
Ilmiah, A., Puspita, E. M., & Siswanti, D. N. (2024). Gambaran Motivasi Berorganisasi Pada Kader Himpunan Mahasiswa Islam (Ditinjau Dari Teori Motivasi Mcclelland). PESHUM: Jurnal Pendidikan, Sosial dan Humaniora, 3(3), 509–517. https://doi.org/10.56799/peshum.v3i3.3474
Jumas, D., Ariani, V., Rita, E., Sesmiwati, S., & Rozaan, A. (2024). Optimasi Pemeliharaan Jalan: Model Pengambilan Keputusan Multi-Kriteria untuk Prioritas di Kabupaten Pasaman, Sumatera Barat. Jurnal Teknik Sipil, 31(3), 327–334. https://doi.org/10.5614/jts.2024.31.3.10
Kardila, D., & Ranggadara, I. (2020). Analytical Hierarchy Process Untuk Menentukan Prioritas Proyek. JOINS (Journal of Information System), 5(1), 95–101. https://doi.org/10.33633/joins.v5i1.3490
Muanley, Y. Y., Son, A. L., Mada, G. S., & Dethan, N. K. F. (2022). Analisis Sensitivitas Dalam Metode Analytic Hierarchy Process dan Pengaruhnya Terhadap Urutan Prioritas Pada Pemilihan Smartphone Android. VARIANSI: Journal of Statistics and Its application on Teaching and Research, 4(3), 173–190. https://doi.org/10.35580/variansiunm32
Pratama, A. D., Azizah, N., & Sabilla, A. D. (2024). Rancang Bangun Sistem Informasi Manajemen Organisasi Kemahasiswaan Berbasis Web di UNISNU Jepara. Jurnal Informatika dan Rekayasa Perangkat Lunak, 6(2), 480-488.
Ramadhan, B. W., Putra, Y. P., Putri, B. F., & Komariah, A. (2021). Penentuan Prioritas Program Kerja Berdasarkan Tingkat Kepentingannya dengan Menggunakan Metode AHP (Penerapan di HMTI Univet Bantara). SENRIABDI, 133–142.
Risandika, H., Agustini, S. P., & Octariadi, B. C. (2023). Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Rekomendasi SMA Islam Swasta Di Kota Pontianak Menggunakan Metode SAW Dan TOPSIS. Jurnal Fasilkom, 13(02), 151–158. https://doi.org/10.37859/jf.v13i02.5178
Risma, A., Saputra, H. K., Hadi, A., & Novaliendry, D. (2026). Penerapan User Acceptance Testing (UAT) pada Pengujian Sistem Informasi Manajemen Operasional Studio Foto Berbasis Client-Server. Journal of Authentic Research, 5(2), 2396–2410. https://doi.org/10.36312/svscqg16
Rismayanti, S., Adi Wibowo, S., & Agus Pranoto, Y. (2021). Implementasi Kombinasi Metode Saw dan Topsis Untuk Seleksi Beasiswa Kartu Indonesia Pintar. JATI (Jurnal Mahasiswa Teknik Informatika), 5(1), 349–356. https://doi.org/10.36040/jati.v5i1.3288
Sari, W. E., B, M., & Rani, S. (2021). Perbandingan Metode SAW dan Topsis pada Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Seleksi Penerima Beasiswa. Jurnal Sisfokom (Sistem Informasi dan Komputer), 10(1), 52–58. https://doi.org/10.32736/sisfokom.v10i1.1027
Sitepu, L. A. B., Astawa, I. W. P., & Sukajaya, I. N. (2025). Implementasi Metode Kombinasi SAW-TOPSIS Untuk Pengambilan Keputusan Penerima Bantuan Program Keluarga Harapan: Implementation of The SAW-TOPSIS Combination Method for Decision-Making For Family Hope Program Assistance Recipients. Citizen: Jurnal Ilmiah Multidisiplin Indonesia, 5(6), 1665–1679. https://doi.org/10.53866/jimi.v5i6.1082
Sudarsana, I. P. E., & Safitri, N. W. N. (2023). Analisis Metode Hybrid SAW – TOPSIS Dalam Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Kelayakan Penerimaan Kredit. Jurnal Akademisi Vokasi, 2(2), 149-157.
Utami, P. K. D., & Saefullah, A. (2025). Qualitative Study of Organizational Management Challenges and Strategies Himpunan Mahasiswa Islam (HMI) at STIE Ganesha. JULIAN: Journal of Law Education and Legal Science, 1(1), 27–34. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.17128813
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Lailatu Badriyah, Priska Choirina, Urnika Mudhifatul Jannah

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.










