Adaptive Intrusion Detection and Automated Cryptographic Response Framework for Real-Time Cyber Threat Mitigation
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.46880/jmika.Vol10No2.pp863-876Keywords:
Adaptive Intrusion Detection, Automated Response, Cryptographic Response, Cybersecurity, Threat Risk AssessmentAbstract
The increasing dynamics of cyberattacks require security systems that are not only capable of detecting threats but also responding rapidly, adaptively, and proportionally. This study proposes the Adaptive Intrusion Detection and Automated Cryptographic Response (AID-ACR) Framework, a closed-loop cybersecurity approach integrating intrusion detection, dynamic threat-risk assessment, automated response, cryptographic mechanisms, and adaptive feedback. The prototype was evaluated through a reproducible simulation study using 32,000 synthetic CICIoT-like traffic samples with 39 numerical features and eight classes: Benign, DDoS, DoS, Recon, Web, Brute Force, Spoofing, and Mirai. Random Forest, XGBoost, LightGBM, and a DNN based on a multilayer perceptron were compared as intrusion detection engines. LightGBM achieved the best overall detection performance with 98.77% accuracy, 98.66% macro-precision, 97.21% macro-recall, and 97.91% macro-F1. The adaptive threat-risk assessment achieved 94.44% agreement with the reference simulation policy and reduced the Unnecessary Response Rate from 0.9749% under static response to 0.5571%, a relative reduction of 42.86%. The prototype produced an end-to-end threat mitigation latency of 0.659 ms per event. These findings indicate that AID-ACR can reduce the detection-to-mitigation gap by combining contextual network controls with cryptographic actions such as session re-keying, key rotation, and key revocation. Validation using the official CICIoT2023 files and a real network testbed remains necessary before operational deployment.
References
Adewole, K. S., Jacobsson, A., & Davidsson, P. (2025). Intrusion detection framework for Internet of Things with rule induction for model explanation. Sensors, 25(6), 1845. https://doi.org/10.3390/s25061845
Almahaqeri, S. A., Almourish, M. H., Nasser, A. A., Alghawli, A. S. A., Elsayed, A. A. K., & Alhejoj, A. N. (2026). An optimized gradient boosting framework for IoT intrusion detection: A comprehensive evaluation on the CICIoT2023 dataset. Scientific Reports, 16, 16909. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-026-47399-5
Barker, E. (2020). Recommendation for key management: Part 1 - General (NIST Special Publication 800-57 Part 1 Revision 5). National Institute of Standards and Technology. https://doi.org/10.6028/NIST.SP.800-57pt1r5
Cerasuolo, F., Bovenzi, G., Ciuonzo, D., & Pescapè, A. (2025a). Attack-adaptive network intrusion detection systems for IoT networks through class incremental learning. Computer Networks, 263, 111228. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.comnet.2025.111228
Cerasuolo, F., Bovenzi, G., Ciuonzo, D., & Pescapè, A. (2025b). Adaptable, incremental, and explainable network intrusion detection systems for Internet of Things. Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence, 144, 110143. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engappai.2025.110143
Chandnani, P., et al. (2025). A physics-based hyper parameter optimized federated multi-layered deep learning model for intrusion detection in IoT networks. IEEE Access, 13, 21992-22010. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2025.3535952
Dworkin, M. (2007). Recommendation for block cipher modes of operation: Galois/Counter Mode (GCM) and GMAC (NIST Special Publication 800-38D). National Institute of Standards and Technology. https://doi.org/10.6028/NIST.SP.800-38D
Gheni, H. Q., & Al-Yaseen, W. L. (2024). Two-step data clustering for improved intrusion detection system using CICIoT2023 dataset. e-Prime - Advances in Electrical Engineering, Electronics and Energy, 9, 100673. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prime.2024.100673
Gustina DM, V., & Ananda, A. (2024). Kecerdasan buatan untuk Security Orchestration, Automation and Response: Tinjauan cakupan [Artificial intelligence for Security Orchestration, Automation and Response: A scoping review]. Jurnal Komputer Terapan, 10(1), 36-47. https://doi.org/10.35143/jkt.v10i1.6247
Hizal, S., Çavusoglu, Ü., & Akgün, D. (2024). A novel deep learning-based intrusion detection system for IoT DDoS security. Internet of Things, 28, 101336. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iot.2024.101336
Jamaluddin, Manalu, D. R., & Rumapea, H. (2025). An integrated framework of cryptographic mechanisms and intrusion detection systems for enhanced cybersecurity. In 2025 Tenth International Conference on Informatics and Computing (ICIC) (pp. 1-4). IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICIC68054.2025.11309624
Kikissagbe, B. R., & Adda, M. (2024). Machine learning-based intrusion detection methods in IoT systems: A comprehensive review. Electronics, 13(18), 3601. https://doi.org/10.3390/electronics13183601
Komal, A., & Li, S. (2026). Intrusion detection in the Internet of Things: A comprehensive review of techniques, architectures, datasets, and emerging trends. Sensors, 26(11), 3405. https://doi.org/10.3390/s26113405
Nelson, A., Rekhi, S., Scarfone, K., & Souppaya, M. (2025). Incident response recommendations and considerations for cybersecurity risk management: A CSF 2.0 community profile (NIST Special Publication 800-61 Revision 3). National Institute of Standards and Technology. https://doi.org/10.6028/NIST.SP.800-61r3
Neto, E. C. P., Dadkhah, S., Ferreira, R., Zohourian, A., Lu, R., & Ghorbani, A. A. (2023). CICIoT2023: A real-time dataset and benchmark for large-scale attacks in IoT environment. Sensors, 23(13), 5941. https://doi.org/10.3390/s23135941
Riandari, F., Afrisawati, A., Afifa, R. M., Syahputra, R., & Ginting, R. (2024). Dynamic optimization algorithms for enhancing blockchain network resilience against distributed attacks. International Journal of Basic and Applied Science, 13(2), 96–111. https://doi.org/10.35335/ijobas.v13i2.499
Sallam, S., El Barachi, M., & Li, N. (2026). Intrusion detection on the Internet of Things: A comprehensive review and gap analysis toward real-time, lightweight, adaptive, and autonomous security. IoT, 7(1), 16. https://doi.org/10.3390/iot7010016
Waelchli, S., & Walter, Y. (2025). Reducing the risk of social engineering attacks using SOAR measures in a real-world environment: A case study. Computers & Security, 148, 104137. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cose.2024.104137
Yaras, S., & Dener, M. (2024). IoT-based intrusion detection system using new hybrid deep learning algorithm. Electronics, 13(6), 1053. https://doi.org/10.3390/electronics13061053
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Jamaluddin Jamaluddin, Darwis Robinson Manalu, Syahril Efendi, Jonson Manurung, Roni Jhonson Simamora

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.










