KUTA-TRANSPARAN: Model Sistem Informasi Terintegrasi untuk Pencegahan Pungutan Liar pada Desa Wisata Berbasis Fraud Risk Management dan Akuntansi Digital

Authors

  • Fauzan Nurahmadi Universitas Sumatera Utara
  • Muhammad Irfan Sarif Universitas Pembangunan Panca Budi
  • Pauzi Ibrahim Nainggolan Universitas Sumatera Utara
  • T. Henny Febriana Harumy 1Universitas Sumatera Utara

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.46880/jmika.Vol10No1.pp168-177

Keywords:

Integrated Information System, Pungli Prevention, Tourism Village, Fraud Risk Management, Digital Accounting, Blockchain, SEM-PLS

Abstract

Illegal levies (pungli) in tourism village public services threaten transparency and accountability of village governance. This study develops the KUTA-TRANSPARAN Framework as an integrated information system model for preventing pungli, with a case study in Kutagugung Village, Karo Regency, North Sumatra. The research adopts Participatory Action Research (PAR) integrated with Design Science Research (DSR), the GAO Fraud Risk Management Framework, and the Technology Acceptance Model (TAM), with hypothesis testing using Structural Equation Modeling–Partial Least Squares (SEM-PLS) on a sample of 120 respondents (purposive sampling). The framework encompasses three dimensions: (1) technology, based on mobile applications and blockchain; (2) business processes, covering prevention (Electronic Village Services/EVS, Electronic Tourism Retribution/ETR, Digital BUMDes Accounting/DBA), detection (real-time monitoring, whistleblowing), and response (auto-sanctions); and (3) institutional, covering policy and transparency culture. The ETR module achieved 81.3% transaction time efficiency (reduced from 15–30 minutes to 2.8 minutes), while the EVS module achieved 70% administrative processing efficiency (reduced from 3–7 days to 4.2 hours). Pilot results show a 23% increase in village retribution revenue (from IDR 12.3 million to IDR 15.1 million per month) attributable to the elimination of revenue leakage. All five hypotheses were supported, with the integration of management information systems and digital accounting demonstrating the strongest effect on financial accountability (β=0.79; p<0.001). The theoretical contribution lies in an interdisciplinary framework integrating informatics management and accounting computerization for fraud prevention in tourism villages. Practically, the blueprint supports SDGs Goal 16 and Goal 17.

References

Arens, A. A., Elder, R. J., Beasley, M. S., & Hogan, C. E. (2022). Auditing and assurance services: An integrated approach (17th ed.). Pearson.

Badan Nasional Penanggulangan Bencana. (2014). Data korban dan kerusakan erupsi Gunung Sinabung 2013–2014. BNPB.

Badan Pemeriksaan Keuangan. (2023). Laporan hasil pemeriksaan semester II tahun 2023: Temuan pengelolaan keuangan desa wisata. BPK RI.

Badan Pengawasan Keuangan dan Pembangunan. (2023). Pedoman pengendalian gratifikasi dan pungutan liar di instansi pemerintah. BPKP.

Bhatnagar, S., & Singh, N. (2018). E-government and corruption: A cross-country analysis. Government Information Quarterly, 35(4), 596–607. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2018.09.001

Chen, Y., Li, H., Wang, L., & Liu, Y. (2020). Blockchain-based public sector accounting: A case study of local government in China. Government Information Quarterly, 37(4), 101489. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2020.101489

Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission. (2013). Internal control—Integrated framework. AICPA.

Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly, 13(3), 319–340. https://doi.org/10.2307/249008

Dewi, R. S. (2024). Geotagging-based whistleblowing system for corruption mapping: Implementation in Bandung City. Journal of Information Systems Engineering, 9(2), 45–58.

Government Accountability Office. (2015). A framework for managing fraud risks in federal programs (GAO-15-593SP). U.S. Government Accountability Office.

Hair, J. F., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2021). Partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM) using R: A workbook. Springer.

Hevner, A. R., March, S. T., Park, J., & Ram, S. (2004). Design science in information systems research. MIS Quarterly, 28(1), 75–105. https://doi.org/10.2307/25148625

Kementerian Desa, PDT, dan Transmigrasi. (2023). Pilot project blockchain untuk BUMDes: Laporan evaluasi Desa Sumberagung. Kemendes PDTT.

Kementerian Desa, PDT, dan Transmigrasi. (2024). Profil desa wisata Indonesia tahun 2024. Kemendes PDTT.

Kementerian Pendayagunaan Aparatur Negara dan Reformasi Birokrasi. (2024). Laporan tahunan SP4N LAPOR! 2024: Statistik pengaduan pelayanan publik. Kemenpan RB.

Kemmis, S., & McTaggart, R. (2005). Participatory action research: Communicative action and the public sphere. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (3rd ed., pp. 559–604). Sage.

Kim, S., Kim, H., & Lee, H. (2021). The impact of e-government on corruption: A meta-analysis. Government Information Quarterly, 38(1), 101547. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2020.101547

Lembaga Penelitian dan Pengabdian Masyarakat Universitas Sumatera Utara. (2024). Evaluasi program FOURSETY: Pemberdayaan ekonomi Desa Kutagugung melalui pengembangan wisata Danau Lau Kawar (Research Report No. 2024/INT/05). LPPM USU.

Mitchell, R. E., & Reid, D. G. (2001). Community integration: Island tourism in Peru. Annals of Tourism Research, 28(1), 113–139. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0160-7383(00)00005-8

Near, J. P., & Miceli, M. P. (2016). Wrongdoing, whistleblowing, and retaliation in the U.S. government. Review of Public Personnel Administration, 36(4), 340–371. https://doi.org/10.1177/0734371X15569221

Pratama, I. G. A. O. (2023). Trust in technology and government: Factors influencing e-retribution adoption in Bali tourism villages. Gadjah Mada International Journal of Business, 25(1), 1–22.

Rahayu, P., Sutanto, J., & Kurnia, S. (2024). Digital leadership and technology adoption in rural Indonesia: Evidence from Central Java. Electronic Journal of Information Systems in Developing Countries, 90(1), e12234.

Romney, M. B., & Steinbart, P. J. (2020). Accounting information systems (14th ed.). Pearson.

Sari, D. K. (2023). SIDULI: Integrated information system for illegal levies reporting connected to SP4N LAPOR!. Jurnal Teknologi Informasi dan Komunikasi, 17(3), 201–215.

Satuan Tugas Sapu Bersih Pungutan Liar. (2023). Laporan kinerja tahun 2023. Satgas Saber Pungli Kementerian PANRB.

Sutherland, E., Sarens, G., & Decaux, L. (2020). Fraud risk management and the fraud risk assessment in the public sector. Journal of Financial Crime, 27(4), 1133–1143. https://doi.org/10.1108/JFC-08-2019-0092

Telkomsel. (2025, 15 Oktober). Telkomsel perluas jaringan 4G di Desa Kutagugung, Kabupaten Karo. Telkomsel Newsroom.

Transparency International. (2023). Global corruption report: Whistleblowing for change. Transparency International Secretariat.

Venkatesh, V., Morris, M. G., Davis, G. B., & Davis, F. D. (2003). User acceptance of information technology: Toward a unified view. MIS Quarterly, 27(3), 425–478. https://doi.org/10.2307/30036540

Wijaya, A. (2022). Digital transformation of public services in Telukjambe Timur District: Impact on waiting time and corruption elimination. Jurnal Administrasi Publik, 28(2), 156–172.

Yli-Huumo, J., Ko, D., Choi, S., Park, S., & Smolander, K. (2016). Where is current research on blockchain technology? A systematic review. PloS One, 11(10), e0163477. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0163477

Published

2026-04-28

Issue

Section

METHOMIKA: Jurnal Manajemen Informatika & Komputersisasi Akuntansi