Prediksi Evaporasi Berbasis Mesin: Perbandingan ANN, KNN, Random Forest dan Regresi Linier
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.46880/jmika.Vol9No2.pp380-386Keywords:
Evaporation, Regression Model, R-squared, Root Mean Squared ErrorAbstract
Evaporation plays a key role in water allocation, yet data limitations are often encountered. This study evaluates four regression models (Linear Regression, K-Nearest Neighbors, Random Forest, and Artificial Neural Network—ANN) to predict evaporation rates at the Banten Climatology Station. Models were assessed using R-squared (R²) and Root Mean Squared Error (RMSE). The results show that the ANN achieved the best accuracy with RMSE = 0.122 and R² = 0.475 (47.5%), followed by Linear Regression (RMSE = 0.123, R² = 0.460), K-Nearest Neighbors (RMSE = 0.126, R² = 0.437), and Random Forest (RMSE = 0.129, R² = 0.406). Other models also provided acceptable predictions, but the ANN stood out as the most accurate and reliable for applications at the Banten Climatology Station. These findings offer valuable insights for water resources management and agricultural planning, highlighting the potential of machine learning techniques to overcome evaporation data limitations.
References
Abed, M., Imteaz, M., Ali Najah Ahmed, A.-M., & Huang, Y. (2022). Modelling monthly pan evaporation utilising Random Forest and deep learning algorithms. Scientific Reports, 12, 13132. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-17263-3
Anandaraj, S., Rooby, J., Beerala, A., Mulukalla, V., & Koduri, S. (2018). Strength prediction using ANN for concrete with Marble and Quarry dust. https://doi.org/10.1109/I2C2SW45816.2018.8997326
Ardiansyah, D. (2023). Perbandingan Model Prediksi Radiasi Matahari Berbasis Mesin Pembelajaran Pada Stasiun Meteorologi Fatmawati Soekarno Bengkulu. Megasains, 14(1). https://doi.org/10.46824/megasains.v14i1.129
Cosenza, D., Korhonen, L., Maltamo, M., Packalen, P., Strunk, J., Næsset, E., Gobakken, T., Soares, P., & Tomé, M. (2020). Comparison of linear regression, k-nearest neighbour and random forest methods in airborne laser-scanning-based prediction of growing stock. Forestry, 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1093/forestry/cpaa034
Fan, J., Chen, B., Wu, L., Zhang, F., Lu, X., & Xiang, Y. (2018). Evaluation and development of temperature-based empirical models for estimating daily global solar radiation in humid regions. Energy, 144, 903–914. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2017.12.091
Singh, V. P. (1988). Hydrologic systems (Number v. 2). Prentice Hall. https://books.google.co.id/books?id=ccsZyAEACAAJ
Vicente-Serrano, S. M., Bidegain, M., Tomas-Burguera, M., Dominguez-Castro, F., El Kenawy, A., McVicar, T. R., Azorin-Molina, C., López-Moreno, J. I., Nieto, R., Gimeno, L., & Giménez, A. (2018). A comparison of temporal variability of observed and model-based pan evaporation over Uruguay (1973–2014). International Journal of Climatology, 38(1), 337–350. https://doi.org/10.1002/joc.5179
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Muchamad Rizqy Nugraha, Haidar Amru Rusdan, Marzuki Sinambela

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.










