Prediksi Evaporasi Berbasis Mesin: Perbandingan ANN, KNN, Random Forest dan Regresi Linier

Authors

  • Muchamad Rizqy Nugraha Sekolah Tinggi Meteorologi Klimatologi dan Geofisika
  • Haidar Amru Rusdan Sekolah Tinggi Meteorologi Klimatologi dan Geofisika
  • Marzuki Sinambela Sekolah Tinggi Meteorologi Klimatologi dan Geofisika

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.46880/jmika.Vol9No2.pp380-386

Keywords:

Evaporation, Regression Model, R-squared, Root Mean Squared Error

Abstract

Evaporation plays a key role in water allocation, yet data limitations are often encountered. This study evaluates four regression models (Linear Regression, K-Nearest Neighbors, Random Forest, and Artificial Neural Network—ANN) to predict evaporation rates at the Banten Climatology Station. Models were assessed using R-squared (R²) and Root Mean Squared Error (RMSE). The results show that the ANN achieved the best accuracy with RMSE = 0.122 and R² = 0.475 (47.5%), followed by Linear Regression (RMSE = 0.123, R² = 0.460), K-Nearest Neighbors (RMSE = 0.126, R² = 0.437), and Random Forest (RMSE = 0.129, R² = 0.406). Other models also provided acceptable predictions, but the ANN stood out as the most accurate and reliable for applications at the Banten Climatology Station. These findings offer valuable insights for water resources management and agricultural planning, highlighting the potential of machine learning techniques to overcome evaporation data limitations.

References

Abed, M., Imteaz, M., Ali Najah Ahmed, A.-M., & Huang, Y. (2022). Modelling monthly pan evaporation utilising Random Forest and deep learning algorithms. Scientific Reports, 12, 13132. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-17263-3

Anandaraj, S., Rooby, J., Beerala, A., Mulukalla, V., & Koduri, S. (2018). Strength prediction using ANN for concrete with Marble and Quarry dust. https://doi.org/10.1109/I2C2SW45816.2018.8997326

Ardiansyah, D. (2023). Perbandingan Model Prediksi Radiasi Matahari Berbasis Mesin Pembelajaran Pada Stasiun Meteorologi Fatmawati Soekarno Bengkulu. Megasains, 14(1). https://doi.org/10.46824/megasains.v14i1.129

Cosenza, D., Korhonen, L., Maltamo, M., Packalen, P., Strunk, J., Næsset, E., Gobakken, T., Soares, P., & Tomé, M. (2020). Comparison of linear regression, k-nearest neighbour and random forest methods in airborne laser-scanning-based prediction of growing stock. Forestry, 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1093/forestry/cpaa034

Fan, J., Chen, B., Wu, L., Zhang, F., Lu, X., & Xiang, Y. (2018). Evaluation and development of temperature-based empirical models for estimating daily global solar radiation in humid regions. Energy, 144, 903–914. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2017.12.091

Singh, V. P. (1988). Hydrologic systems (Number v. 2). Prentice Hall. https://books.google.co.id/books?id=ccsZyAEACAAJ

Vicente-Serrano, S. M., Bidegain, M., Tomas-Burguera, M., Dominguez-Castro, F., El Kenawy, A., McVicar, T. R., Azorin-Molina, C., López-Moreno, J. I., Nieto, R., Gimeno, L., & Giménez, A. (2018). A comparison of temporal variability of observed and model-based pan evaporation over Uruguay (1973–2014). International Journal of Climatology, 38(1), 337–350. https://doi.org/10.1002/joc.5179

Published

2025-10-31

Issue

Section

METHOMIKA: Jurnal Manajemen Informatika & Komputersisasi Akuntansi